SpoilerTV Wiki

Chat about all the general off-topic stuff here - News, Advice, Opinions, etc.

Moderators: Moderators, Moderators, Moderators, Moderators

SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby Desmond Hume on Thu Jul 03, 2008 3:56 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoilertv

as made by desmond hume :P enjoy and feel free to edit

but it needs you help to stay alive and they want me to change it to something!! HELP I DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO!!!! I NEED SOMEONE WITH WIKI EDITING POWER! PETE!!!!!! ADAM!!!! DARK!!!!!!! MARQKK HELP :(!!!!!!!!
Desmond : " penny is that really you ! :

Penny " nah " *hangs up*

Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Desmond Hume
Supporting Actor
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: Scotland


Ads are removed for registered users






Ads are removed for registered users

Re: ITS ALIVE!!!!! ( spoiler tv wiki ) NOW IT NEEDS YOUR HELP!!!

Postby Desmond Hume on Thu Jul 03, 2008 9:52 pm

its been put up for deletion
Desmond : " penny is that really you ! :

Penny " nah " *hangs up*

Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Desmond Hume
Supporting Actor
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: ITS ALIVE!!!!! ( spoiler tv wiki ) NOW IT NEEDS YOUR HELP!!!

Postby Maqrkk on Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:14 pm

Well first of all. Why make a SpoilerTV wiki?
Second of all, please do not make thread titles (or large amounts of text) in capitals. I'm going to edit it.
Image
Xbox360 Gamertag: Maqrkk - 26310 Gamerscore
User avatar
Maqrkk
Forum Technician
 
Posts: 3492
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:21 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Gender: Male

Re: SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby Desmond Hume on Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:32 pm

the real question is why not make a spoilerTv wiki :D and sorry about the caps :(
Desmond : " penny is that really you ! :

Penny " nah " *hangs up*

Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Desmond Hume
Supporting Actor
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby Adam on Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:36 pm

There isn't really a point to this, but it wouldn't be bad to have. If it's still ok to edit, then I'll do some after school today. I've got a few ideas.
Breaking Bad | The Office | Entourage | Lost | Californication
User avatar
Adam
Former Staff Member
 
Posts: 1894
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:14 am
Location: Australia
Gender: Male

Re: SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby Desmond Hume on Thu Jul 03, 2008 11:39 pm

i love you adam :P!!! also i guess their is not a point but still their will be a point when we take over the world :D!! and dang i see you still dont have your tag >.<!! I need to chase maqrkk up about that or ask pete or something :lol:
Desmond : " penny is that really you ! :

Penny " nah " *hangs up*

Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Desmond Hume
Supporting Actor
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby PkmnTrainerJ on Fri Jul 04, 2008 9:07 pm

Hmmm...first time I see this and it's since been deleted.
User avatar
PkmnTrainerJ
Stunt Double
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 8:02 pm
Location: Sinnoh
Gender: Male

Re: SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby Adam on Sat Jul 05, 2008 3:36 am

I'm editing it now. It looks pretty good so far ;)

EDIT: Ok I've finished it! Take a peek: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoilertv

Recently created pages that are about websites have a tendancy to be "speedy deleted". The criteria for this is as follows:
These criteria apply to all namespaces, and are in addition to namespace-specific criteria in following sections.

1. Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content. This does not include: poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, badly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes; some of these, however, may be deleted as vandalism in blatant cases.
2. Test pages. Testing is permitted in the sandbox and in users' own user space.
3. Pure vandalism. This includes blatant and obvious misinformation, and redirects created by cleanup from page-move vandalism.
4. Recreation of deleted material. A copy, by any title, of a page deleted via a deletion discussion, provided the copy is substantially identical to the deleted version and that any changes in the recreated page do not address the reasons for which the material was deleted. This does not apply to content that has been undeleted via deletion review, deleted via proposed deletion, or to speedy deletions (although in that case, the previous speedy criterion, or other speedy criteria, may apply). Also, content moved to user space for explicit improvement is excluded, although material moved or copied to circumvent Wikipedia's deletion policy is not.
5. Banned user. Pages created by banned users in violation of their ban, with no substantial edits by others.
6. Technical deletions. Non-controversial maintenance, such as temporarily deleting a page to merge page histories, or performing uncontroversial page moves.
7. Author requests deletion, if requested in good faith, and provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author. If the author blanks the page, this can be taken as a deletion request.
8. Talk pages whose corresponding article does not exist. This excludes any talk page which is useful to the project, and in particular: deletion discussions that are not logged elsewhere, user talk pages, talk pages for images on Wikimedia Commons, and talk subpages (such as archives) whose corresponding "top-level" page exists. This includes talk pages of pages which were deleted since the creation of the talk page.
9. Office actions. The Wikimedia Foundation office reserves the right to speedily delete a page temporarily in cases of exceptional circumstances. Deletions of this type should not be reversed without permission from the Foundation.
10. Pages that serve no purpose but to disparage their subject or some other entity (e.g., "John Q. Doe is an imbecile"). These are sometimes called "attack pages". This includes a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral version in the history to revert to. Administrators deleting such pages should not quote the content of the page in the deletion summary, and if the page is an article about a living person it should not be restored or recreated by any editor until it meets biographical article standards.
11. Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote some entity and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion.
12. Blatant copyright infringement. Text pages that meet all of the following (for images and media, see I9):
* The material was copied from another website or other source (but consider the possibility that the other copy was obtained from Wikipedia—see Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks);
* There is no non-infringing content on either the page itself, or in the history, worth saving;
* The material was introduced at once by a single person; and
* There is no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a free license (see also List of countries' copyright length as a guide).
Notify the page's creator when tagging a page for deletion under this criterion; the template {{nothanks-sd}} is available for this. After deleting, administrators should recreate the page from earlier noninfringing page content if available. If multiple deletion criteria apply, list them all on the deletion summary. If notified of a plausible error, the deleting administrator should restore the content and, if a confirmation e-mail has not been received, follow the Wikipedia:Copyright problems procedure, replacing the article with the {{copyvio}} template. Some suspected copyright infringements are listed at Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations.


Fortunately I don't think I have made the page fall under any of that. Andy I hope this is all alright with you, if you want me to make any changes or delete the entire page for any reasons just give me a heads up and I'll do so.
Breaking Bad | The Office | Entourage | Lost | Californication
User avatar
Adam
Former Staff Member
 
Posts: 1894
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:14 am
Location: Australia
Gender: Male

Re: SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby b3rt4 on Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:05 am

Adam wrote:EDIT: Ok I've finished it! Take a peek: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoilertv

Hm,
Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for Spoilertv in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings.
Image
Image

TigerBlood
User avatar
b3rt4
VIP
 
Posts: 3690
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 10:46 am
Location: Germany
Gender: Male

Re: SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby Adam on Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:48 am

B*******!!! They deleted it!! After some digging I've found out that it is because there are only 3 other websites that point towards it, and therefore they think that the page is a form of advertising. After being tagged by one user (this was when there was nothing on the page), 3 other users proposed to delete it, and another actually has deleted it.

Well that lasted the whole of 5 mins! Oh well.
Breaking Bad | The Office | Entourage | Lost | Californication
User avatar
Adam
Former Staff Member
 
Posts: 1894
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:14 am
Location: Australia
Gender: Male

Re: SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby Desmond Hume on Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:43 am

you did your best adam :(
il have a word with wikipedia
Desmond : " penny is that really you ! :

Penny " nah " *hangs up*

Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Desmond Hume
Supporting Actor
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby Adam on Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:48 am

Yeah I tried ;) Lol having a word with wikipedia will be like having a word with a piece of cabbage - you won't get anywhere with it and it'll be totally pointless. They always stick to their guns, and many long-time professional members against the word of a stranger won't convince them. If I were you I'd just accept defeat :P
Breaking Bad | The Office | Entourage | Lost | Californication
User avatar
Adam
Former Staff Member
 
Posts: 1894
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:14 am
Location: Australia
Gender: Male

Re: SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby Desmond Hume on Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:57 am

lol has no one told you ? I NEVER ACCEPT DEFEAT!! I remember with my other wikipedia account teh dissaloud my artical on blind mans bluf!! so i re posted it and they deleted it and i reposted ...ect...ect then got banned :P
I SHALL FIGHT TO THE DEATH!!!

ps.might need to make a penition

pps. I made an officel complaint hear - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... oticeboard
at the bottom
Desmond : " penny is that really you ! :

Penny " nah " *hangs up*

Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Desmond Hume
Supporting Actor
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby Desmond Hume on Sat Jul 05, 2008 1:44 pm

ADAMMM HELP THEY ARE DISCUSING IT ADAM AND USEING FANCEY WORDS I DONT KNOW HELP!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia: ... #Spoilertv

thats the link :O!@!! im being eaten!!
Desmond : " penny is that really you ! :

Penny " nah " *hangs up*

Image
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Desmond Hume
Supporting Actor
 
Posts: 887
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: SpoilerTV Wiki

Postby Adam on Sat Jul 05, 2008 2:09 pm

First off please don't double post mate, just edit the previous entry as it is seen as a form of increasing your post count.
Second: Basically the guy at the end saying:
Endorse deletion - no referenced sources in the article and after reading the content of the article this is clearly a non-notable website. LakeBoater (talk) 12:55, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

is just trying to say that you have no proof of what you claim (i.e. it's been published in the news, talked about by Darlton etc), and therefore is not worth mentioning.

You raise some good points in that article though. There's been more references to it than what I thought.
Breaking Bad | The Office | Entourage | Lost | Californication
User avatar
Adam
Former Staff Member
 
Posts: 1894
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:14 am
Location: Australia
Gender: Male

Next

Return to General Discussion


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests